Back

Drained footings


Drained footing with surcharge (weightless soil, phi'=20 degrees), vertical load

Benchmark 6.4
Result 6.52
Discrepancy on Collapse Load 1.84%
Discrepancy on Input Parameters 1%

GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Simple footing located on horizontal soil surface.
ANALYSIS TYPE: Drained.
KEY DIMENSIONS: Footing width 1m.
ADEQUACY FACTOR LOADING: Vertical load on footing (unit permanent load 1kN/m2).
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: Surcharge = 1 kN/m2 (permanent) , symmetrical half space.
SOIL PROPERTIES: c'=0, phi' = 20 degrees, soil unit weight = 0 kN/m3.
PARTIAL FACTOR SET: Unity.
BENCHMARK SOLUTION: 6.3994 (Nq value).
REFERENCE: Chen (2007). Limit Analysis and Soil Plasticity, J. Ross Publishing.
NOTES: Error on load = 1.9%. 'Benchmark' partial factor set with factor of 1.010 (i.e. 1%) on tan(phi)' is required to give benchmark solution. Corresponding value of phi' is 19.8 degrees.



Drained footing with surcharge (weightless soil, phi'=30 degrees), vertical load

Benchmark 18.4
Result 18.99
Discrepancy on Collapse Load 3.12%
Discrepancy on Input Parameters 1.3%

GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Simple footing located on horizontal soil surface.
ANALYSIS TYPE: Drained.
KEY DIMENSIONS: Footing width 1m.
ADEQUACY FACTOR LOADING: Vertical load on footing (unit permanent load 1kN/m2).
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: Surcharge = 1 kN/m2 (permanent) , symmetrical half space.
SOIL PROPERTIES: c'=0, phi' = 30 degrees, soil unit weight = 0 kN/m3.
PARTIAL FACTOR SET: Unity.
BENCHMARK SOLUTION: 18.4011 (Nq value).
REFERENCE: Chen (2007). Limit Analysis and Soil Plasticity, J. Ross Publishing.
NOTES: Error on load = 3.7%. 'Benchmark' partial factor set with factor of 1.013 (i.e. 1.3%) on tan(phi)' is required to give benchmark solution. Corresponding value of phi' is 29.7 degrees.



Drained footing with surcharge (weightless soil, phi'=40 degrees), vertical load

Benchmark 64.2
Result 67.75
Discrepancy on Collapse Load 5.25%
Discrepancy on Input Parameters 1.5%

GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Simple footing located on horizontal soil surface.
ANALYSIS TYPE: Drained.
KEY DIMENSIONS: Footing width 1m.
ADEQUACY FACTOR LOADING: Vertical load on footing (unit permanent load 1kN/m2).
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: Surcharge = 1 kN/m2 (permanent) , symmetrical half space.
SOIL PROPERTIES: c'=0, phi' = 40 degrees, soil unit weight = 0 kN/m3.
PARTIAL FACTOR SET: Unity.
BENCHMARK SOLUTION: 64.1952 (Nq value)
REFERENCE: Chen (2007). Limit Analysis and Soil Plasticity, J. Ross Publishing
NOTES: Error on load = 5.7%. 'Benchmark' partial factor set with factor of 1.015 (i.e. 1.5%) on tan(phi)' is required to give benchmark solution. Corresponding value of phi' is 39.6 degrees.


Drained footings


Drained footing with surcharge (weightless soil, c'=1 kN/m2, phi'=20 degrees), vertical load

Benchmark 21.23
Result 21.24
Discrepancy on Collapse Load 0.04%
Discrepancy on Input Parameters 1%

GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Simple footing located on horizontal soil surface.
ANALYSIS TYPE: Drained.
KEY DIMENSIONS: Footing width 1m.
ADEQUACY FACTOR LOADING: Vertical load on footing (unit permanent load 1kN/m2).
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: Surcharge = 1 kN/m2 (permanent) , symmetrical half space.
SOIL PROPERTIES: c'=1 kN/m2, phi' = 20 degrees, soil unit weight = 0 kN/m3.
PARTIAL FACTOR SET: Unity.
BENCHMARK SOLUTION: 21.2341 (= Nq+Nc = 6.3994+14.8347)
REFERENCE: Chen (2007). Limit Analysis and Soil Plasticity, J. Ross Publishing
NOTES: Error on load = 2.1%. 'Benchmark' partial factor set with factor of 1.010 (i.e. 1.0%) on c' and tan(phi)' is required to give benchmark solution. Corresponding values of c'and phi' are 0.990, and 19.8 degrees respectively.



Drained footing with surcharge (weightless soil, c'=1 kN/m2, phi'=30 degrees), vertical load

Benchmark 48.54
Result 50.16
Discrepancy on Collapse Load 3.23%
Discrepancy on Input Parameters 1.3%

GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Simple footing located on horizontal soil surface.
ANALYSIS TYPE: Drained.
KEY DIMENSIONS: Footing width 1m.
ADEQUACY FACTOR LOADING: Vertical load on footing (unit permanent load 1kN/m2).
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: Surcharge = 1 kN/m2 (permanent) , symmetrical half space.
SOIL PROPERTIES: c'=1 kN/m2, phi' = 30 degrees, soil unit weight = 0 kN/m3.
PARTIAL FACTOR SET: Unity.
BENCHMARK SOLUTION: 48.5407 (= Nq+Nc = 18.4011+30.1396)
REFERENCE: Chen (2007). Limit Analysis and Soil Plasticity, J. Ross Publishing
NOTES: Error on load = 3.8%. c' = 1.013, phi' = 30.33 degrees is required to give theoretically exact solution of 50.4489. Corresponding error on input soil properties, c' and tan(phi') = 1.32%.
NOTES: Error on load = 3.8%. 'Benchmark' partial factor set with factor of 1.013 (i.e. 1.3%) on c' and tan(phi)' is required to give benchmark solution. Corresponding value of c'and phi' are 0.987, and 29.7 degrees respectively.



Drained footing with surcharge (weightless soil, c'=1 kN/m2, phi'=40 degrees), vertical load

Benchmark 139.51
Result 147.3
Discrepancy on Collapse Load 5.29%
Discrepancy on Input Parameters 1.7%

GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Simple footing located on horizontal soil surface.
ANALYSIS TYPE: Drained.
KEY DIMENSIONS: Footing width 1m.
ADEQUACY FACTOR LOADING: Vertical load on footing (unit permanent load 1kN/m2).
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: Surcharge = 1 kN/m2 (permanent) , symmetrical half space.
SOIL PROPERTIES: c'=1 kN/m2, phi' = 40 degrees, soil unit weight = 0 kN/m3.
PARTIAL FACTOR SET: Unity.
BENCHMARK SOLUTION: 139.5083 (= Nq+Nc = 64.1952+75.3131)
REFERENCE: Chen (2007). Limit Analysis and Soil Plasticity, J. Ross Publishing
NOTES: Error on load = 5.8%. 'Benchmark' partial factor set with factor of 1.017 (i.e. 1.7%) on c' and tan(phi)' is required to give benchmark solution. Corresponding values of c'and phi' are 0.983, and 39.5 degrees respectively.



Drained footing (phi'=20 degrees, gamma = 1 kN/m2), vertical load

Benchmark 1.43
Result 1.72
Discrepancy on Collapse Load 17.13%
Discrepancy on Input Parameters 6.5%


ANALYSIS TYPE: Drained.
KEY DIMENSIONS: Footing width 1m.
ADEQUACY FACTOR LOADING: Vertical load on footing (unit permanent load 1kN/m2).
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: Surcharge = 0 kN/m2, symmetrical half space, footing base rough.
SOIL PROPERTIES: c'=0 kN/m2, phi' = 20 degrees, soil unit weight = 1 kN/m3.
PARTIAL FACTOR SET: Unity.
BENCHMARK SOLUTION: 1.427 (Ngamma/2 value)
REFERENCE: Smith, C.C. (2005) Complete limiting stress solutions for the bearing capacity of strip footings on a Mohr-Coulomb soil. Geotechnique, 55 (8), October, pp 607-612.
NOTES: Error on load = 20.7%. 'Benchmark' partial factor set with factor of 1.065 (i.e. 6.5%) on tan(phi)' is required to give benchmark solution. Corresponding value of phi' is 18.8 degrees.
COMMENT: Result obtained using medium nodal density. This type of bearing capacity problem involves a complex network of sliplines and requires a finer nodal spacing to achieve a good solution. The Terzaghi bearing capacity formula using the EC7 recommended formula for N_gamma = 2*(Nq-1)*tan(phi) gives a solution of 1.97, an error of 38.1%.



Drained footing (phi'=30 degrees, gamma = 1 kN/m2), vertical load

Benchmark 7.38
Result 9.36
Discrepancy on Collapse Load 21.21%
Discrepancy on Input Parameters 6.1%


ANALYSIS TYPE: Drained.
KEY DIMENSIONS: Footing width 1m.
ADEQUACY FACTOR LOADING: Vertical load on footing (unit permanent load 1kN/m2).
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: Surcharge = 0 kN/m2, symmetrical half space, footing base rough.
SOIL PROPERTIES: c'=0 kN/m2, phi' = 30 degrees, soil unit weight = 1 kN/m3.
PARTIAL FACTOR SET: Unity.
BENCHMARK SOLUTION: 7.377 (Ngamma/2 value)
REFERENCE: Smith, C.C. (2005) Complete limiting stress solutions for the bearing capacity of strip footings on a Mohr-Coulomb soil. Geotechnique, 55 (8), October, pp 607-612.
NOTES: Error on load = 26.9%. 'Benchmark' partial factor set with factor of 1.061 (i.e. 6.1%) on tan(phi)' is required to give benchmark solution. Corresponding value of phi' is 28.5 degrees.
COMMENT: Result obtained using medium nodal density. This type of bearing capacity problem involves a complex network of sliplines and requires a finer nodal spacing to achieve a good solution. The Terzaghi bearing capacity formula using the EC7 recommended formula for N_gamma = 2*(Nq-1)*tan(phi) gives a solution of 10.05, an error of 36.2%.



Drained footing (phi'=40 degrees, gamma = 1 kN/m2), vertical load

Benchmark 42.78
Result 56.37
Discrepancy on Collapse Load 24.1%
Discrepancy on Input Parameters 5.6%


ANALYSIS TYPE: Drained.
KEY DIMENSIONS: Footing width 1m.
ADEQUACY FACTOR LOADING: Vertical load on footing (unit permanent load 1kN/m2).
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: Surcharge = 0 kN/m2, symmetrical half space, footing base rough.
SOIL PROPERTIES: c'=0 kN/m2, phi' = 40 degrees, soil unit weight = 1 kN/m3.
PARTIAL FACTOR SET: Unity.
BENCHMARK SOLUTION: 42.78 (Ngamma/2 value)
REFERENCE: Smith, C.C. (2005) Complete limiting stress solutions for the bearing capacity of strip footings on a Mohr-Coulomb soil. Geotechnique, 55 (8), October, pp 607-612.
NOTES: Error on load = 31.7%. 'Benchmark' partial factor set with factor of 1.056 (i.e. 5.6%) on tan(phi)' is required to give benchmark solution. Corresponding value of phi' is 38.4 degrees.
COMMENT: Result obtained using medium nodal density. This type of bearing capacity problem involves a complex network of sliplines and requires a finer nodal spacing to achieve a good solution. The Terzaghi bearing capacity formula using the EC7 recommended formula for N_gamma = 2*(Nq-1)*tan(phi) gives a solution of 53.0, an error of 23.9%.



Drained footing with surcharge (c'=0 kN/m2, phi'=20 degrees, gamma = 15 kN/m2), vertical load

Benchmark 170.45
Result 175.22
Discrepancy on Collapse Load 2.7%
Discrepancy on Input Parameters 1.8%


ANALYSIS TYPE: Drained.
KEY DIMENSIONS: Footing width 1m.
ADEQUACY FACTOR LOADING: Vertical load on footing (unit permanent load 1kN/m2).
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: Surcharge = 20 kN/m2 (permanent) , symmetrical half space, footing base rough.
SOIL PROPERTIES: c'=0 kN/m2, phi' = 20 degrees, soil unit weight = 15 kN/m3.
PARTIAL FACTOR SET: Unity.
BENCHMARK SOLUTION: 170.45
REFERENCE: Benchmark derived using ABC software, Martin (2004) User Guide for ABC. Analysis of Bearing Capacity, Version 1.0, http://www-civil.eng.ox.ac.uk/people/cmm/software/abc/.
NOTES: 'Benchmark' partial factor set with factor of 1.018 (i.e. 1.8%) on tan(phi)' is required to give benchmark solution. Corresponding value of phi' is 19.7 degrees.
COMMENT: Result obtained using medium nodal density. This type of bearing capacity problem involves a complex network of sliplines and requires a finer nodal spacing to achieve a good solution.



Drained footing with surcharge (c'=0 kN/m2, phi'=30 degrees, gamma = 15 kN/m2), vertical load

Benchmark 553.38
Result 576.1
Discrepancy on Collapse Load 3.9%
Discrepancy on Input Parameters 1.5%


ANALYSIS TYPE: Drained.
KEY DIMENSIONS: Footing width 1m.
ADEQUACY FACTOR LOADING: Vertical load on footing (unit permanent load 1kN/m2).
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: Surcharge = 20 kN/m2 (permanent) , symmetrical half space, footing base rough.
SOIL PROPERTIES: c'=0 kN/m2, phi' = 30 degrees, soil unit weight = 15 kN/m3.
PARTIAL FACTOR SET: Unity.
BENCHMARK SOLUTION: 553.38
REFERENCE: Benchmark derived using ABC software, Martin (2004) User Guide for ABC. Analysis of Bearing Capacity, Version 1.0, http://www-civil.eng.ox.ac.uk/people/cmm/software/abc/.
NOTES: 'Benchmark' partial factor set with factor of 1.015 (i.e. 1.5%) on tan(phi)' is required to give benchmark solution. Corresponding value of phi' is 29.6 degrees.
COMMENT: Result obtained using medium nodal density. This type of bearing capacity problem involves a complex network of sliplines and requires a finer nodal spacing to achieve a good solution.



Drained footing with surcharge (c'=5 kN/m2, phi'=20 degrees, gamma = 15 kN/m2), vertical load

Benchmark 247.13
Result 251.19
Discrepancy on Collapse Load 1.6%
Discrepancy on Input Parameters 0.8%


ANALYSIS TYPE: Drained.
KEY DIMENSIONS: Footing width 1m.
ADEQUACY FACTOR LOADING: Vertical load on footing (unit permanent load 1kN/m2).
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: Surcharge = 20 kN/m2 (permanent) , symmetrical half space, footing base rough.
SOIL PROPERTIES: c'=5 kN/m2, phi' = 20 degrees, soil unit weight = 15 kN/m3.
PARTIAL FACTOR SET: Unity.
BENCHMARK SOLUTION: 247.13
REFERENCE: Benchmark derived using ABC software, Martin (2004) User Guide for ABC. Analysis of Bearing Capacity, Version 1.0, http://www-civil.eng.ox.ac.uk/people/cmm/software/abc/.
NOTES: 'Benchmark' partial factor set with factor of 1.008 (i.e. 5.3%) on c' and tan(phi)' is required to give benchmark solution. Corresponding values of c' and phi' are 4.96 kN/m2 and 19.85 degrees respectively.
COMMENT: Result obtained using medium nodal density. This type of bearing capacity problem involves a complex network of sliplines and requires a finer nodal spacing to achieve a good solution.



Drained footing with surcharge (c'=5 kN/m2, phi'=30 degrees, gamma = 15 kN/m2), vertical load

Benchmark 711.5
Result 735.52
Discrepancy on Collapse Load 3.3%
Discrepancy on Input Parameters 1.1%


ANALYSIS TYPE: Drained.
KEY DIMENSIONS: Footing width 1m.
ADEQUACY FACTOR LOADING: Vertical load on footing (unit permanent load 1kN/m2).
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: Surcharge = 20 kN/m2 (permanent) , symmetrical half space, footing base rough.
SOIL PROPERTIES: c'=5 kN/m2, phi' = 30 degrees, soil unit weight = 15 kN/m3.
PARTIAL FACTOR SET: Unity.
BENCHMARK SOLUTION: 711.5
REFERENCE: Benchmark derived using ABC software, Martin (2004) User Guide for ABC. Analysis of Bearing Capacity, Version 1.0, http://www-civil.eng.ox.ac.uk/people/cmm/software/abc/.
NOTES: 'Benchmark' partial factor set with factor of 1.011 (i.e. 1.1%) on c' and tan(phi)' is required to give benchmark solution. Corresponding values of c' and phi' are 4.95 kN/m2 and 29.7 degrees respectively.
COMMENT: Result obtained using medium nodal density. This type of bearing capacity problem involves a complex network of sliplines and requires a finer nodal spacing to achieve a good solution.



Drained footing with surcharge (c'=5 kN/m2, phi'=40 degrees, gamma = 15 kN/m2), vertical load

Benchmark 2656.95
Result 2827.73
Discrepancy on Collapse Load 6.0%
Discrepancy on Input Parameters 1.5%


ANALYSIS TYPE: Drained.
KEY DIMENSIONS: Footing width 1m.
ADEQUACY FACTOR LOADING: Vertical load on footing (unit permanent load 1kN/m2).
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: Surcharge = 20 kN/m2 (permanent) , symmetrical half space, footing base rough.
SOIL PROPERTIES: c'=5 kN/m2, phi' = 40 degrees, soil unit weight = 15 kN/m3.
PARTIAL FACTOR SET: Unity.
BENCHMARK SOLUTION: 2656.95
REFERENCE: Benchmark derived using ABC software, Martin (2004) User Guide for ABC. Analysis of Bearing Capacity, Version 1.0, http://www-civil.eng.ox.ac.uk/people/cmm/software/abc/.
NOTES: 'Benchmark' partial factor set with factor of 1.015 (i.e. 1.5%) on c' and tan(phi)' is required to give benchmark solution. Corresponding values of c' and phi' are 4.93 kN/m2 and 39.6 degrees respectively.
COMMENT: Result obtained using medium nodal density. This type of bearing capacity problem involves a complex network of sliplines and requires a finer nodal spacing to achieve a good solution.


Drained footings with water table


Drained footing (phi'=30 degrees, gamma = 19.62 kN/m2), vertical load

Benchmark 144.74
Result 183.71
Discrepancy on Collapse Load 21.21%
Discrepancy on Input Parameters 6.1%


ANALYSIS TYPE: Drained.
WATER REGIME: Dry
KEY DIMENSIONS: Footing width 1m.
ADEQUACY FACTOR LOADING: Vertical load on footing (unit permanent load 1kN/m2).
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: Surcharge = 0 kN/m2, symmetrical half space, footing base rough.
SOIL PROPERTIES: c'=0 kN/m2, phi' = 30 degrees, soil unit weight = 19.62 kN/m3.
PARTIAL FACTOR SET: Unity.
BENCHMARK SOLUTION: 144.74
REFERENCE: Smith, C.C. (2005) Complete limiting stress solutions for the bearing capacity of strip footings on a Mohr-Coulomb soil. Geotechnique, 55 (8), October, pp 607-612.
NOTES: Error on load = 26.9%. 'Benchmark' partial factor set with factor of 1.061 (i.e. 6.1%) on tan(phi)' is required to give benchmark solution. Corresponding value of phi' is 28.5 degrees.
COMMENT: Result obtained using medium nodal density. This type of bearing capacity problem involves a complex network of sliplines and requires a finer nodal spacing to achieve a good solution. The Terzaghi bearing capacity formula using the EC7 recommended formula for N_gamma = 2*(Nq-1)*tan(phi) gives a solution of 197.2, an error of 36.2%.



Drained footing, submerged (phi'=30 degrees, gamma = 19.62 kN/m2), vertical load

Benchmark 72.37
Result 91.85
Discrepancy on Collapse Load 21.21%
Discrepancy on Input Parameters 6.1%


ANALYSIS TYPE: Drained.
WATER REGIME: Water table above footing and soil surface.
KEY DIMENSIONS: Footing width 1m.
ADEQUACY FACTOR LOADING: Vertical load on footing (unit permanent load 1kN/m2).
BOUNDARY CONDITIONS: Surcharge = 0 kN/m2, symmetrical half space, footing base rough.
SOIL PROPERTIES: c'=0 kN/m2, phi' = 30 degrees, soil unit weight = 19.62 kN/m3.
PARTIAL FACTOR SET: Unity.
BENCHMARK SOLUTION: 72.37
REFERENCE: Smith, C.C. (2005) Complete limiting stress solutions for the bearing capacity of strip footings on a Mohr-Coulomb soil. Geotechnique, 55 (8), October, pp 607-612.
NOTES: Error on load = 26.9%. 'Benchmark' partial factor set with factor of 1.061 (i.e. 6.1%) on tan(phi)' is required to give benchmark solution. Corresponding value of phi' is 28.5 degrees.
COMMENT: Result obtained using medium nodal density. This type of bearing capacity problem involves a complex network of sliplines and requires a finer nodal spacing to achieve a good solution. The Terzaghi bearing capacity formula using the EC7 recommended formula for N_gamma = 2*(Nq-1)*tan(phi) gives a solution of 98.6, an error of 36.2%. This result is half that of the equivalent dry case. NB The unit weight of the footing was set to 9.81 kN/m3 in order that it had no effective weight.


Back